Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
55,015 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 49,453 (89.9%) 
Undecided
  
 3,072 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
 2,490 (4.5%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-07 16:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Giganti by Camille Claudel (Musée d'Art et d'Industrie de Roubaix), (Fr)

 Question The CAT has 3 images, all apparently taken on 21 Jan 2015. The base in each is different. Are these images of one statue or of three? If one, why the different base? --Tagooty (talk) 02:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Tagooty: Thanks for your advice The CAT actually contains three images, which I photographed on January 21, 2015 in Musée d'Art et d'Industrie de Roubaix. Two of them represent the bronze from the collection of the Palais des Beaux-Arts in Lille Giganti, Palais des Beaux-Arts in Lille . I suppose the third (with a white marble base) would be the one from Bremen, Giganti, Kunsthalle Bremen. Although it is signed A. Rodin, the pictorial application of the brownish black patina reveals that the cast iron is a work by Claudel. I have no other details on these works. --Pierre André (talk) 10:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Neutral Thanks for the explanations. I now understand that there are 3 statues which appear to be almost identical (copies or reproductions?). As I am still confused and have limited knowledge of this subject, I will leave it to more knowledgeable people to decide. --Tagooty (talk) 16:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Best in Scope The image is too dark but the scope is perfect --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-09 07:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Mini Clubman (F54) John Cooper Works - left front view
Used in:
de:Mini Clubman
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 10:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-09 07:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Enzblume - from north
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-09 16:04 (UTC)
Scope:
L'implorante (Musée d'Art et d'Industrie de Roubaix), (Fr)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-05-09 19:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Fresco of Saint-Grégoire (Marckolsheim)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-10 04:31 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Simon und Juda church in Trier Pulpit.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-10 05:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Madonna enthroned with Baby Jesus by Stefano Veneziano (Correr Museum)

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 08:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 10:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-10 05:30 (UTC)
Scope:
San Lio church in Venice - Main entrance.

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 13:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 10:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-10 06:16 (UTC)
Scope:
The Crucifixion and Transfiguration of Christ by Juan Reixach Musée Goya, Castres France

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 16:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 10:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-10 08:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Memorial sign to victims of Holodomor in Volodarka
Used in:
Global usage

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 08:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 10:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-10 08:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Toyota RAV4 Plug-in Hybrid GR Sport - left front view
Used in:
de:Toyota RAV4, en:Toyota RAV4
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 10:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-10 08:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Toyota RAV4 Plug-in Hybrid GR Sport - left rear view
Used in:
en:Toyota RAV4
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 10:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-10 08:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Mitsubishi Eclipse PS - right front view
Used in:
de:Mitsubishi Motors, de:Mitsubishi Eclipse
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 10:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-05-10 13:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Pedum spondyloideum (Pedum Oyster), left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-05-10 15:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Cercopithecus mitis erythrarchus (Samango monkey)

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 16:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-05-10 15:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Cercopithecus mitis erythrarchus (Samango monkey) head
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-05-11 05:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Bittium impendens, shell
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-11 07:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Land Rover Range Rover Velar - left rear view
Used in:
de:Range Rover Velar
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-11 07:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Mini Hatch (F66) - right rear view
Used in:
de:Mini F66, en:Mini Hatch
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-11 09:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Mass grave of Soviet partisans and underground activists in Volodarka
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-11 10:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Virgen de la Asunta, Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Arequipa, Peru
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-11 10:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Blessed-Anna-of-the-Angels-Monteagudo in Basilica Cathedral of Arequipa, (Pérou)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-11 16:12 (UTC)
Scope:
La Sagrada Familia Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Arequipa, Peru

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 17:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 18:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC) on 2024-05-11 18:22 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Approved gravestone emblems of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs – Latin (Christian) Cross
Used in:
en:United States Department of Veterans Affairs emblems for headstones and markers
Reason:
The US Department of Veterans Affairs permits graphics on government-furnished headstones that are approved emblems of belief. This is USVA emblem 01. -- --Thi (talk) 18:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-05-11 18:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Approved gravestone emblems of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs – Buddhist
Used in:
en:United States Department of Veterans Affairs emblems for headstones and markers, en:Dharmachakra
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-12 04:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Stone bench in the garden of Schloss Wildenberg (Zernez)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-12 04:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Fragment of a funerary stele inv.292 - Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice)

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-12 04:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Commemorative plaque in memory of Enrico Cosenz in Campo San Provolo (Venice)

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 17:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-12 04:40 (UTC)
Scope:
The Crucifixion and Transfiguration of Christ by Juan Reixach Musée Goya, Castres France
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-05-12 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Cerithium nesioticum (Island Horn), shell, juvenile
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-12 07:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Mass grave of Soviet soldiers in Volodarka
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-05-12 11:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Starboard Bow view of MV Maa
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-12 12:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Mini Hatch (F66) - right front view
Used in:
de:Kleinwagen, de:Mini F66
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-12 12:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Tesla Model S Plaid - right front view
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-12 14:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Dome of Iglesia Santa Isabel, Pucará, Peru
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-05-12 15:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Ill lock of Canal de Colmar

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 17:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-12 17:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Benarrow PB 5 - left rear view
Used in:
de:Benarrow
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-05-12 18:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi (Blesbok) head
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-05-12 18:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi (Blesbok) juvenile
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-05-12 20:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Sylvicapra grimmia (Common duiker) female, jumping
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-13 04:06 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Simon und Juda church in Trier Icon Mary and child in the church.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-13 05:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancient Roman statues in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Zeus
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-13 05:10 (UTC)
Scope:
The ordination of Saint Martin by Master of Riofrío Musée Goya, Castres France
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-13 05:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Well heads in Campo San Provolo, Venice
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-13 09:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Reliefs of the Terrace of the Elephants, Angkor Thom (Cambodia)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-13 09:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Chornobyl disaster liquidators, Volodarka
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-13 11:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Syncerus caffer (African buffalo) skull, decomposing
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-13 11:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Château de Gruyères, aerial view from north east side
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-13 16:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Pierre d'Ault, view from rue du 11 Novembre (France)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-14 04:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Roman bridge, Trier South side.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-14 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
San Cristoforo by Stefano Veneziano - Correr Museum
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-14 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Pierre de Blagnac, France - Le monument aux morts (The war memorial)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-14 05:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Campo San Provolo (Venice), southern exposure
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-14 09:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Pierre d'Ault.- Statue de Saint Pierre assis en pape, (Fr)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
grendel|khan on 2024-05-14 09:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Pratt & Whitney J58
Used in:
many, including en:Pratt & Whitney J58
Reason:
Looks to be the de facto picture of this engine in most places. -- grendel|khan
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-14 09:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Ispidina picta (African pygmy kingfisher)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-14 10:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Halcyon leucocephala (Grey-headed kingfisher)
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris)[edit]

   

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-03-31 13:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 10:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-03-31 13:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 10:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

African chaffinch taxonomy change[edit]

Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 18:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-23 18:48 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London
Used in:
en:Bertrand Russell, de, es
I opened the most valued review. 1656321.jpg seems to be taken before the restoration. --Thi (talk) 11:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 10:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 11:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC) on 2024-04-12 11:27 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London

 Comment Ok for the base, but wa can't really see the face. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 10:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Mavathoor Kere (lake) - correction of scope[edit]

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=751225986"