One aspect of my campaigning for bees concerns the actions of councils. Indeed, I have a page on this website full of ideas for councils to help them protect and assist pollinators.
Councils are potentially in a very strong position to help bees and pollinators. After all, they manage large areas of public land, and importantly, they grant planning permission.
Many schemes to assist pollinators would actually save councils money: reducing mowing, including clover in grassy seed mixes. Indeed, some councils have already done much to embrace the challenge of
assisting pollinators.
Some apparently 'green' initiatives are unfortunately not so green after all. This was the case with a proposed solar energy park in an environmentally sensitive area, Rampisham Down, Dorset, UK.
The scheme would have necessitated construction work, movement of heavy vehicles and equipment into the area, and presumably the laying of cables. Once erected, the solar panels themselves would create shade at least for part of the day, and would require maintenance.
For me, despite the promise to deliver a 'green' benefit, it would have been disruptive for wildlife. This is not joined up thinking on sustainability.
Even if they had offered to create a pollinator meadow, this would not have been an environmentally friendly way to address energy provision. Far better to leave Rampisham Down to nature, and add the panels to the roofs of public buildings instead, such as council offices, schools, libraries and so on.
So what happened?
In the case of Rampisham Down, local people and wildlife organisations campaigned against the project, and a government inquiry resulted in the project being shelved.
By all means, encourage councils generally to be more
responsible, and ask them to commit to help pollinators. Here is a proposal for a national strategy for pollinators which can be adapted for local areas, to get you started. However, do be aware that even initiatives considered to be 'green' need to be examined carefully to weigh up the claimed future benefits, versus the impact and alternatives.